Author Archive for a Guest

Competition Needed Among “Climate Ready” Crops [Guest Post]

It’s a pleasure for us to publish this thoughtful guest post written by “Marriott” — good friend, good neighbor, and good ol’ fashioned lover of Freedom.

What if I said that you could plant corn any time of year, in any climate condition, and still harvest the same succulent vegetable that many of us grew up eating every summer? What if you could do this for any vegetable? During my morning commute I read an article in the Washington Post that discussed how this may be a possibility for the future of farming. (I urge you to read the Post article)

Although there are many issues to discuss with this idea, my focus will deal with the corporate side of things and the future of this potentially lucrative industry. Feel free to debate the usage of these seeds, their methods, or anything else that hits a nerve with this issue.

Geneticists and scientists working for major bio-tech and agricultural development firms have been working on developing “Climate Ready” crops. The basic idea is that through genetically altered seeds, these scientists can create crops that are drought, heat, flooding resistant. They are basically “Global-Warming Proofing” our crops. And with the recent sticker shock at grocery stores throughout the country, this appears as a welcome opportunity to help the impending food crisis.

The problem with this recent technology is patent monopolization. From the article:

Three companies – BASF of Germany, Syngenta of Switzerland and Monsanto of St. Louis – have filed applications to control nearly two-thirds of the climate-related gene families submitted to patent offices worldwide.

The nature of these patents is even more troubling as corporations are able to eliminate competition. In one such case a corporation is applying for a patent to use one gene, and in the language of the patent the corporation effectively bans other corporations from using the same gene in any other “Climate Ready” seed.

Continue reading ‘Competition Needed Among “Climate Ready” Crops [Guest Post]‘

Fun Facts About Change!

Hey, kids!  How about some fun facts about coins?!?11!  Cool! - ECM

The Time For Change Is Now

It is in violation of several laws my pleasure and an usurpation of the freedom of speech a distinct honor to introduce Edmund C. Moy, Director of the United States Mint, who RUN has a very special RUN AWAY! message for the readers of Tropophilia:

My fellow Americans, I have a very special and important announcement to make. Over the weekend, it came to the attention of the Secret Service, which as you know works for the Department of the Treasury, which as you know works for the United States Mint, which as you know works for me… that this is a blog “about change.” Not only is this blog “about” change. It’s a blog about the “love” of change.

There are three things I love in this world: Power. Freedom. And Change.

Not that softy “change we can believe in” mumbo jumbo. I’m talkin’ ’bout some coin, baby. I love the jingle. I love the jangle. I love the exquisite feeling of the metal in my greasy palm, the sound it makes when pings against the bottom of my pink piggy bank on my desk.

If this blog is about the love of change, then this blog is about me. And that’s why I’ve directed the NSA, which as you know works for the President, who as you know is my boss, who as you probably don’t know owes me a big favor — to confiscate this blog and its assets, to detain its editors as enemy combatants, and to give me full editorial control of Tropophilia.

Don’t worry, readers. You shouldn’t notice a huge change. As you can see we’ve redecorated a little, but the theme will not change. Or… will it? Bwahaha.

And don’t even think about ditching Tropophilia. I have the NSA tracking previous and current visitors. You are obligated to visit at least once per day and to comment once per week about how much you love coins a.k.a. change, as designed by the U.S. Mint. Which as you know, I run.

In the name of the Quarter, the Dime, and the commemorative Sacagawea dollar,

Edmund C. Moy
Director, U.S. Mint
Editor-in-Chief, Tropophilia.com

Give Big: How Giving $10 Is Like Giving $100,000

The following guest post was written by Christy Moss, a writer and fundraiser for the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois.   Christy is passionate about encouraging a spirit of philanthropy among her peers.  Her favorite non-profits include National Public Radio, Kiva, public libraries, and Greenville College, her alma mater.

pennies.jpgThrough her show The Big Give, Oprah seeks to change the way we view giving. While most of us already agree with her pay-it-forward style of philanthropy, it is a bit more difficult to connect with contestants giving away $100,000, when $10 is all we have to give. Don’t be discouraged! I am here to help you realize that $10 is a significant start – and that giving away $10 is more like giving away $100,000 than you realize.

Forget the Numbers

“Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.” – Helen Keller

Did you see the Easter episode of the Big Give? Contestants were challenged to give away $100,000 in 24 hours. One contestant was actually paralyzed by the amount she had to give away. And only one contestant was able to give away all $100,000. Numbers can be crippling. Whether your gift is large or small, $10 or $10,000, giving is an act of the heart, not the act of a calculator. Don’t be discouraged by starting small. You may feel your gift is insignificant, but what if everyone who made $10 gifts felt the same way? Your gift, combined with the gifts of countless others, do make a substantial difference.

Continue reading ‘Give Big: How Giving $10 Is Like Giving $100,000′

“…and nothing but the truth, so help me Google” [Guest Post]

It’s a pleasure for me to present a guest post submitted by Jarry Taylor, a partner with Maynard, Cooper & Gale PC — one of Alabama’s leading law firms located in scenic Birmingham.  And… he’s my dad!  Thanks to Jarry/Dad for contributing to Tropophilia!

The American Bar Association’s Litigation News reports on a recent phenomenon many of us law types have been talking about, namely the change in the way investigations are performed and how to get information about people involved in legal cases.  Forget the old style gum shoe black cloak, long-lens photographer investigator (although they do still come in handy sometimes).  We’re now talking about finding out all sorts of neat and interesting stuff from MySpace, Facebook and even Match.com.

Have a witness you’re about to depose in a case coming to trial next month?  Worried you might not know all there is to know about him?  Think you should fork out money for an investigator to dig up information about him?  Nah, it’s all right there on the internet and in the social networking world where nothing is sacred.

“They” tell you to be careful what you post as a student because colleges, grad schools and employers will check out those crazy photos you thought it would be fun to share with your buds.  But, those beyond those years or the witless still include information that, sometimes, can be very helpful to the inquiring lawyer on the other side of a case.  Courts are now having to deal with evidentiary questions, and report decisions on whether such information is admissible in court or not.  Even if it’s not substantive information relevant to your case, it can always go to the credibility of that witness.

“I solemly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me Google.”  Oh, and that applies to lawyers, too!