Monthly Archive for May, 2008

Page 4 of 7

Habitual Thinking

I read an interesting article in The New York Times (our favorite source) about habits and their influence on human creativity and innovation. Janet Rae-Dupree writes that

brain researchers have discovered that when we consciously develop new habits, we create parallel synaptic paths, and even entirely new brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, innovative tracks. Rather than dismissing ourselves as unchangeable creatures of habit, we can instead direct our own change by consciously developing new habits. In fact, the more new things we try — the more we step outside our comfort zone — the more inherently creative we become, both in the workplace and in our personal lives.

Rae-Dupree goes on to note that, in addition to today’s much emphasized powers of analysis and procedure, we’re born with equally strong innovative and collaborative problem-solving capabilities. Those two approaches, however, are known to go under biological and cultural attack throughout our younger years. Biologically, at puberty the brain often “throws out” innovation and collaboration because they go underutilized and are deemed less cognitively “valuable.” Culturally, the emphasis these days on analytic and systematic learning (especially in the face of standardized testing) fosters less development of the more creative mental faculties.

It turns out that “stretching” our minds into new ways of thinking can be beneficial in multiple arenas. Physically, learning to think in new ways keeps our brains and even our bodies healthy. One interviewee in the article notes that “researchers who asked folks to do something different every day — listen to a new radio station, for instance — found that they lost and kept off weight. No one is sure why, but scientists speculate that getting out of routines makes us more aware in general”.

Encouraging unique thought processes can also benefit businesses, non-profits, and government. More and more, I hear about job interviews where people are asked something like: “How many golf balls does it take to fill up a school bus.” They don’t know the answer, and don’t really care what number the candidate comes up with. Smart companies are investigating and investing not in what potential hires know, but in how they think.

Continue reading ‘Habitual Thinking’

Questioning Things: Vol. VI

I live in North Carolina. You might have heard about a little primary election we had on Tuesday. I actually voted weeks ago, taking advantage of my state’s one-stop early voting process: voters can show up at any early voting location in their county, register, and vote on the same day. The early voting locations open about three weeks ahead of election day, and offer weekend hours for voters who are unable to vote during the work week. I walked into my polling place, voted, and was back at100 laptop work within 20 minutes. As I walked back to work, I couldn’t help thinking: I can’t believe an idea this indisputably good for our state actually came to fruition. Now don’t get me wrong: I love NC, and we have a number of incredibly dedicated civil servants working in all levels of state and local government, not to mention brilliant and talented policy advocates in the nonprofit realm.  And yet, for some reason I’m still shocked that early voting is real.

On the other end of the spectrum is the $100 laptop.  This strikes me as such a powerful idea, such a POSSIBLE dream–there is, in fact, an excellent design–and yet…the project is stalled and faces innumerable obstacles.

So here’s the question: what are other policies, products or inventions (maybe online tools?) that seem almost too good to be true?  What’s something amazing you’ve seen/heard about, only to be shocked when it became reality?  Alternatively, what’s the best idea that you don’t think will ever come to fruition?

My second story (and question) is inspired by an article in Fast Company magazine (thanks for the plane reading material, Dan!) on “The Brand Called Obama:”  obama sign

Politics, after all, is about marketing — about projecting and selling an image, stoking aspirations, moving people to identify, evangelize, and consume. The promotion of the brand called Obama is a case study of where the American marketplace — and, potentially, the global one — is moving. His openness to the way consumers today communicate with one another, his recognition of their desire for authentic “products,” and his understanding of the need for a new global image — all are valuable signals for marketers everywhere

As Jarred and I have disclosed before, we’re fans of Obama’s politics.  But more and more, I find myself attracted to the Obama “brand” with the same fierce loyalty I feel for a company like Apple.  Let’s just say, if Apple released an electric toothbrush, I would probably buy it.  These brand loyalties are interesting to me.  Jarred and a number of our friends are irrationally loyal to one particular “barbecue” (in quotes because it’s not legitimate ‘cue) joint in their neighborhood, despite all convincing evidence of its over-rated nature.  What forms and perpetuates these loyalties?

Again, here’s the question: what brand(s) are you loyal to–to a fault?  What brands will you absolutely pay a premium to support, even if logical alternatives exist?  When you examine your brand loyalties from a detached perspective–I can, for instance, recognize that an Apple toothbrush would probably be awful…and that I would buy it–what loyalties seem ridiculous?  Which can you justify, and which are completely irrational?

Image of $100 laptop used under a Creative Commons license courtesy of Flickr user Kofoed.

Obama sign image used under a Creative Commons license courtesy of Flickr user sweetashvegas.

Support disaster relief in Myanmar

Things are bad on the other side of the world. Myanmar has been ravaged by nature, and its government is so far reluctant to accept outside aid. Regardless, Google has set up this page to help direct donations to UNICEF and other relief organizations. Please consider contributing as you are willing and able. — J

(0)

Drowning in Paperwork Session at COF

In a guest post on Tactical Philanthropy, I write about a session at the Council on Foundations conference called “Drowning in Paperwork, Distracted from Purpose.” This post might only be of real interest to folks who are involved in nonprofit fundraising or organized philanthropy, but I found the session really useful. Here’s an excerpt of my post:

I attended a session Monday afternoon that, frankly, won’t sound nearly as sexy and exciting as some of the topics covered recently by my fellow bloggers (micro philanthropy, socially responsible investing, venture philanthropy, etc). And yet “Drowning in Paperwork, Distracted from Purpose” spawned a great discussion about desperately needed measures for improving the grantmaking process that (I hope) a number of funders will implement when they return home from DC.

I go on to describe a few ideas that–while certainly not revolutionary–would help funder-grantee relations significantly, and help nonprofits (AND foundations) focus more on the important elements of their work. One example:

“Start[ing] from Zero:” the notion that foundation staff and board members should start from scratch and ask themselves “what information do I absolutely need?” to evaluate a grant proposal or project. Starting from zero means that funders should always be able to articulate to their grantees WHY they need follow-up materials, grant reports, a letter of support, etc. Many nonprofits interviewed for the study reported frustration from submitting reports to funders and not hearing any feedback. One nonprofit executive quoted in the study quipped: “We assume that [the funders] feed everything to a giant fiery furnace.” Starting from zero encourages funders to only request information that will be used in learning from grants or evaluating past and future efforts.

You can read the rest here. I should have one or two more guest posts at Tactical Philanthropy as I look back to my notes from the last few days. But let me take the opportunity to express what a pleasure it’s been to meet Sean and my fellow guest-bloggers this week, and to see segments of such a traditional-minded sector embrace blogging wholeheartedly. Good stuff; many thanks to Sean and Tactical Philanthropy for the opportunity.

Magazines: LPs of the Future?

In a comment to one of our most popular posts, I suggested that books may be the vinyl records of the future — collectors’ items in a digital age, kept for reasons of nostalgia and “high fidelity.” John Battelle picks up the same theme in this thoughtful post, but points instead to magazines as the LP’s successor. A great, quick read. — J

(0)