<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers: Responsible To Their Readers First, or To Themselves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/</link>
	<description>the love of change</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Round-Up: What&#8217;s So Special About Blogging? &#124; Tropophilia</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Round-Up: What&#8217;s So Special About Blogging? &#124; Tropophilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>[...] Corvida at SheGeeks, who had added her own thoughts to his original theory.  I responded with a critique, which prompted Corvida to rebut and clarify.  Along the way, readers of all three blogs have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corvida at SheGeeks, who had added her own thoughts to his original theory.  I responded with a critique, which prompted Corvida to rebut and clarify.  Along the way, readers of all three blogs have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who do I owe you? : The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Who do I owe you? : The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-994</guid>
		<description>[...] Hodson asked an interesting question today: What do I owe my readers? This lead to a number of interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hodson asked an interesting question today: What do I owe my readers? This lead to a number of interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve, for your thoughts.  And I enjoyed reading &lt;a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/29/what-do-i-owe-my-readers/" rel="nofollow"&gt;your related thoughts&lt;/a&gt; in your follow-up post on WinExtra.

Glad to see the whole "social network ownership" vagueness cleared up, and to see that we agree there!  I absolutely agree with you in that regard!

Also glad to see we mesh on the too-freely-used "blogger" term.  As opposed to the distinction you draw, however, I think blogger captures any person who writes on the web in a repetitive, chronological fashion: from &lt;a href="http://winextra.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;you&lt;/a&gt; to me to &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michael Arrington&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Fake Steve Jobs&lt;/a&gt;.  Some are journalists, others enthusiasts, others fiction writers... but all bloggers.  To say a "blogger" should or should not do something -- unless it involves the basic mechanics of keeping a blog -- is overly generalizing, in my view.

Looking forward to hearing your other ideas and reactions after you've given them some thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve, for your thoughts.  And I enjoyed reading <a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/29/what-do-i-owe-my-readers/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.winextra.com');">your related thoughts</a> in your follow-up post on WinExtra.</p>
<p>Glad to see the whole &#8220;social network ownership&#8221; vagueness cleared up, and to see that we agree there!  I absolutely agree with you in that regard!</p>
<p>Also glad to see we mesh on the too-freely-used &#8220;blogger&#8221; term.  As opposed to the distinction you draw, however, I think blogger captures any person who writes on the web in a repetitive, chronological fashion: from <a href="http://winextra.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/winextra.com');">you</a> to me to <a href="http://techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/techcrunch.com');">Michael Arrington</a> to <a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/fakesteve.blogspot.com');">Fake Steve Jobs</a>.  Some are journalists, others enthusiasts, others fiction writers&#8230; but all bloggers.  To say a &#8220;blogger&#8221; should or should not do something &#8212; unless it involves the basic mechanics of keeping a blog &#8212; is overly generalizing, in my view.</p>
<p>Looking forward to hearing your other ideas and reactions after you&#8217;ve given them some thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hodson</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-987</guid>
		<description>First off Corvida is right - there are some great comments here which is nice to see.

There is a lot of what you have written that I want to take some time and think about but I did want to clarify one point. When I said in my post &lt;i&gt;our networks&lt;/i&gt; I wasn't referring to the larger blogger ecosphere. What I was referring to was the network that develops around each individual blogger and the regular readers of that blog who partake in making and responding to comments.

In effect you have your own network here as you reply to comments made about your posts and then your readers in turn comment on them. How much more social is that and if this interaction grows over time then yes you have a network of people who if you meet on another blog you have already a pattern of friendship in place so your conversation there will be affected by that.

Additionally I would like to say to a couple of the commenters who have a problem with the whole &lt;b&gt;blogger&lt;/b&gt; naming  I feel exactly the same way. I think that the moment a blogger steps over a fuzzy line of a blog being a personal space to one where they begin offering up opinions and thoughts on things like technology they have stopped being a &lt;i&gt;blogger&lt;/i&gt; per se. It is my feeling that they have become the equivilent of a digital columnist rather than a "blogger".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off Corvida is right - there are some great comments here which is nice to see.</p>
<p>There is a lot of what you have written that I want to take some time and think about but I did want to clarify one point. When I said in my post <i>our networks</i> I wasn&#8217;t referring to the larger blogger ecosphere. What I was referring to was the network that develops around each individual blogger and the regular readers of that blog who partake in making and responding to comments.</p>
<p>In effect you have your own network here as you reply to comments made about your posts and then your readers in turn comment on them. How much more social is that and if this interaction grows over time then yes you have a network of people who if you meet on another blog you have already a pattern of friendship in place so your conversation there will be affected by that.</p>
<p>Additionally I would like to say to a couple of the commenters who have a problem with the whole <b>blogger</b> naming  I feel exactly the same way. I think that the moment a blogger steps over a fuzzy line of a blog being a personal space to one where they begin offering up opinions and thoughts on things like technology they have stopped being a <i>blogger</i> per se. It is my feeling that they have become the equivilent of a digital columnist rather than a &#8220;blogger&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-985</guid>
		<description>There are some great comments here!

@Sierra Alpha Mike - Sometimes those personal posts are what makes a post so great. The majority of the posts on my site (SheGeeks) are very much from a personal stand point. Sometimes, that's all you can do. You can't always speak for everyone nor remain objective on everything. You have feelings and are human. In being objective, sometimes you have to remove your personality from the posts. We can't all do that, and I'd rather a blogger didn't do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some great comments here!</p>
<p>@Sierra Alpha Mike - Sometimes those personal posts are what makes a post so great. The majority of the posts on my site (SheGeeks) are very much from a personal stand point. Sometimes, that&#8217;s all you can do. You can&#8217;t always speak for everyone nor remain objective on everything. You have feelings and are human. In being objective, sometimes you have to remove your personality from the posts. We can&#8217;t all do that, and I&#8217;d rather a blogger didn&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Corvida has written an excellent response to my critique &lt;a href="http://shegeeks.net/what-i-mean-by-being-an-information-filter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  I followed up with &lt;a href="http://shegeeks.net/what-i-mean-by-being-an-information-filter/#comment-395855" rel="nofollow"&gt;a comment&lt;/a&gt;.  Keep the conversation going!  And welcome to any &lt;a href="http://shegeeks.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;SheGeeks&lt;/a&gt; readers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corvida has written an excellent response to my critique <a href="http://shegeeks.net/what-i-mean-by-being-an-information-filter/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/shegeeks.net');">here</a>.  I followed up with <a href="http://shegeeks.net/what-i-mean-by-being-an-information-filter/#comment-395855" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/shegeeks.net');">a comment</a>.  Keep the conversation going!  And welcome to any <a href="http://shegeeks.net" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/shegeeks.net');">SheGeeks</a> readers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What I Mean By Being An &#34;Information Filter&#34; &#124; SheGeeks</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>What I Mean By Being An &#34;Information Filter&#34; &#124; SheGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] of Tropophilia has a unique response to a conversation started by Steven Hodson and one that I also supplied my thoughts about (see: Be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Tropophilia has a unique response to a conversation started by Steven Hodson and one that I also supplied my thoughts about (see: Be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sierra Alpha Mike</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Sierra Alpha Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-954</guid>
		<description>the word "bloggers" should have been struck out. Does that tag not work here? &lt;strike&gt;test&lt;/strike&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the word &#8220;bloggers&#8221; should have been struck out. Does that tag not work here? <strike>test</strike></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sierra Alpha Mike</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sierra Alpha Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Please tell me that I'm not the only one skeptical of  bloggers people who use blogs to post very personal stories, or very political, partisan posts completely outside the realm of objectivity ... and then come back and pass something off as digital journalism as if nothing happened. It especially perturbs me when "digital journalism" pieces are treated like be-all, end-all truth. That seems like the biggest problem to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me that I&#8217;m not the only one skeptical of  bloggers people who use blogs to post very personal stories, or very political, partisan posts completely outside the realm of objectivity &#8230; and then come back and pass something off as digital journalism as if nothing happened. It especially perturbs me when &#8220;digital journalism&#8221; pieces are treated like be-all, end-all truth. That seems like the biggest problem to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://tropophilia.com/2008/04/28/bloggers-responsible-to-their-readers-or-to-themselves/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tropophilia.com/?p=256#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Buhzactly. There's so much information out there, I find myself reading blogs not so much for the information contained within, but for the personalities they're filtered through. If I want to read the Entire Internet every day, I will, but most likely, I'm going to find a handful of internet personalities I enjoy and I'll peruse what they happen to be interested in at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buhzactly. There&#8217;s so much information out there, I find myself reading blogs not so much for the information contained within, but for the personalities they&#8217;re filtered through. If I want to read the Entire Internet every day, I will, but most likely, I&#8217;m going to find a handful of internet personalities I enjoy and I&#8217;ll peruse what they happen to be interested in at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
