A Story
While I usually take the bus to work in the morning so I can get in some reading, on my way home I usually end up taking the Metro and making the 20-minute hike up Mt. Saint Alban to our apartment building. It’s nice to get some exercise and fresh air after sitting in front of a computer all day.
As I near the end of my walk each night, I walk right by the National Cathedral. It’s been getting darker a little later these days as we move towards springtime, and so the light on the cathedral has been especially beautiful the past week or so. Tonight as I walked by, I peered up at the heights of this enormous building, trying to make out some of the gargoyles. I’ve always heard that there was a Darth Vader gargoyle up there somewhere, but I had never seen it and had no idea where it was.
I considered pulling out my iPhone to look it up on Wikipedia, but it just felt like a little too much effort and I had to hurry and grab some dinner before a basketball game on TV. Besides, why stare down for three minutes at the glowing screen of my iPhone when I could spend those three minutes watching the glow of the setting sun on the facade of the cathedral?
In those three minutes looking at the cathedral, I thought about how lamentable it is that the wealth of information and the empowering connectivity of the Internet is tied to screens. It is indeed a remarkable advance that, with devices like the iPhone, the full Internet is now in our pockets. But it’s still on a screen in our pockets. When we want to look something up on the web, we have to briefly tune out everything and everyone around us — our reality — so that we can focus on the screen. Why do we have to abandon the object of our research, in order to research it?
Augmented Reality: What Is It?
The time is approaching when this will no longer be the case. In December, The Economist ran a piece in their Technology Quarterly about the growing field of computing and design called “augmented reality” (or sometimes “augmented vision”). As opposed to virtual reality — which attempts to completely replace our perception of the “real” world with a digital one — augmented reality seeks to supplement the reality that we experience everyday with additional information.
The Wikipedia entry for augmented reality takes a fascinating approach to defining the history of this field. One would think that augmented reality — even as an idea — could really only trace its roots about forty or fifty years, extending no further into the past than the early computer age.
But the article insists that “to describe the history of Augmented Reality is also to describe man’s journey of adding to the natural world he was born in.” And thus the first entry in the timeline for augmented reality is not the creation of the first digital computer in 1938, but the estimated installation of cave paintings in Lascaux, France around 15,000 B.C. — “images in a darkened cave that started the idea of enhancing the real world.”
No, Seriously… What Is It?
Seen Terminator? You know those couple of times they show the world as seen by Arnold? He can see the world around him, but placed on top of that view are several different layers of information: targeting, facial recognition, etc. Or think of modern day fighter jets with their “heads-up displays” which overlay speed, altitude, navigational, and weapons systems information on a transparent screen in the pilot’s main field of vision. That’s augmented reality.
Do not be frightened or turned off by the fact that I’ve used two somewhat violent examples to illustrate augmented reality. There are actually many peaceful, safety-promoting, and — dare I say it — fun implementations of augmented reality. As Wikipedia mentions, the yellow first-down line on the TV when we watch football is a type of augmented reality. Come to think of it, so are the scoreboard and score ticker that flash on the screen as we watch the game. Car companies are starting to install heads-up displays in some vehicles that, in addition to showing some of the information usually found on your dashboard like speed and gas level, implement infrared sensors to overlay a night-vision layer over the windshield to help drivers avoid obstacles in the dark.
Another Story
I think that in my lifetime, we will see the introduction of some sort of visual enhancement — be it an optical implant or just a high-tech pair of eyeglasses — that will literally offer to turn us into the Terminator. In fifty years, someone around my age will be walking down Wisconsin Avenue and have the same recollection about the Darth Vader gargoyle. And he won’t have to choose between learning about the cathedral and enjoying how it holds the dying daylight. He’ll be able to do both at the same time.
He’ll push a button on top of his phone, which itself will be wirelessly connected to the Internet at speeds higher than today’s laptops can acheieve. The phone will use a technology similar to today’s Bluetooth to transmit visual data to a built-in antenna his glasses, which will then be projected in beyond-HD quality onto the lens. Like me, this guy will have 20/20 vision, but he’ll still be wearing glasses in case a tweet comes in from the office asking if he can work overtime that weekend, or an e-mail from his friends inviting him to happy hour that night, attaching turn-by-turn directions that he can choose to project as arrows on the sidewalk — all on his lens, of course.
He looks up at the cathedral in the dim orange light — just as I did tonight — except this time, he pushes a button on his phone and says “link cloud – cathedral.” Like bubbles in a pot of water that is about to reach its boiling point, little blue dots start to pop up over the building. These dots are projected onto his view of the cathedral through the lens of his glasses. He glances over the tags projected next to the dots: worship schedule, contact information, history, architecture. He holds down a button on his phone and then whispers “architecture.” A new series of dots explodes over the cathedral, sticking to the arches, the doors, the buttresses, the gargoyles.
Pausing at the crosswalk, he holds down the button and says “filter – gargoyles”. Some of the dots fade away, and labels fade in next to the remaining orbs. Not seeing the gargoyle he wants, he holds down the button and says “search – Darth Vader”. Seconds later, all the dots fade. The lens of his glasses darken slightly, leaving one small box clear bordered in bright green with the words “Darth Vader gargoyle” in white along the top of the box. Holding the button again — “select – Wikipedia.” In one dark margin of his glasses, a picture of the famous gargoyle appears; in the other margin, the scrolling text of the Wikipedia entry on the statue.
One last click of the button – “bookmark” – and then he rounds the corner and heads into his building. His glasses grow clear again. Across the bottom, a ticker shows the title and artist of the next track playing on his iPod.
The Final Frontier?
Think of the extraordinary doors that this type of technology could open. The medium of the computer fades away. The world becomes our medium again, and the computer no longer replaces it but enhances it. We can return to paper books, because our iGlasses will overlay all the links and extra information we want as we turn the pages. Everything we can access on our phones and computers now: e-mail, contacts, photos, phone numbers, news, blogs, weather, sports, music, social networking… it will all jump from the computer as a separate existence into our day-to-day. We will have control over what shows up when, and we can always turn it off and on as we please. We can unplug or plug in as easy as we turn our cell phones on or off vibrate mode.
Everywhere we look, we can learn more. We’ll look at a metro station and be able to see a map, a schedule, and if there are any posted delays. We’ll look at a restaurant and see the three most popular lunch items and their prices. We’ll look at a bank and see our balances. We’ll look at a movie theatre and see the times for that night’s showings, be able to say “two tickets at 7:30″ for a new release and automatically have Fandango purchase the tickets using our credit cards and have them waiting for us that night.
Amazing.
A Bridge Too Far?
Think of the extraordinary chaos that this type of technology could unleash. My fictional character, distracted by his in-motion research, could have been hit by a UPS truck, itself driven by a driver distracted by the on-lens traffic information scrolling across his field of vision.
Our abilities to remember facts, or people’s faces, or even people’s names will be so underutilized that we’ll come to rely on our iGlasses as our secondary, electronic brains. We’ll be Facebooking people while we talk to them, getting the updates on their lives while they do the same for us. We’ll send links back and forth instead of conversing. Our eyes will be so layered with information about the world around us that we’ll pass by friends on the street without seeing them.
And then there will be ads. Everywhere we look, there will be ads. You’ll look at someone’s shoes that you admire for two seconds too long, and a little box will open on the side of your lens showing you an ad from Nike and an option to order a pair, or to download turn-by-turn directions to the nearest retailer.
We think the link chasing on Wikipedia is addictive. We go to one article today, and follow link after link until we’ve ended up on the other side of the Internet reading about something we had no intention of reading… and next thing you know, you’ve missed your bus or let your toast go cold in the toaster. Think about how addicted and distracted we’d be if everywhere we looked — let me say that again: everywhere we looked — there was a link to be accessed.
One clear night, a father will be looking at the stars with his son. They’ll sync their iGlasses so that the father can navigate his son through some of the constellations, the connections between the stars being traced on their lenses by soft red lines. As they lay in the green grass of their backyard in the country, the father will call up the history of the astrological signs related to some of the constellations. Then he’ll look up his horoscope. As the text and images sweep over their screens, they smile and laugh and, indeed, bond. But as they do so, on the other side of their darkened lenses, hundreds of miles above them, a brilliant shooting star streaks across the sky. It leaves a soft, red, lonely trail — not unlike the red lines once projected on their lenses, but now covered up by a YouTube video — that endures for many seconds, and then fades away. The entire event goes unseen by the pair. The father and son will have learned together, shared together, laughed together. But they will have missed seeing and sharing an event that, once upon a time, was worth more than any link or graphic could ever be worth.
Amazing.
–
First image courtesy of website of Rep. Grace Napolitano. Other images used under Creative Commons licenses courtesy of Flickr users charlietyack and Leonard Low.
Subscribe by email


This is a really fun topic. With any luck, someone will stumble across this discussion in thirty years and laugh at how utterly wrong we were to be so hopeful. The machines will have taken over by then. (Forgive me, I’ve been watching the Sarah Connor Chronicles)
By the way, all of my links should pop into new windows.
1: one of XKCD’s takes on Wikipedia
2: The glasses might not need to be better than HD (1920×1080). In fact, full 1080p is probably overkill. The eye doesn’t work like a camera, so your display doesn’t have to stand up to the same type of scrutiny. An HD display is supposed to look great from a wide variety of distances and angles. Your glasses only have to look great from a single vantage point. The camera mounted outside the glasses would, of course, need to have the highest resolution possible.
3: I wouldn’t want to have a pair of iGlasses and a phone. I’d expect for my glasses to have all of the necessary circuitry and power built in. Interface is probably the tough one here, but with some relative of of today’s gesture-based interfaces or something that we hadn’t even thought of yet, a clever programmer could probably make it stupidly easy to control.
4: Regarding safety, I’d point you to the collision avoidance systems that are going into some cars today. With the right software, your iGlasses can make you safer. Your brain notice some patterns faster than others, and your glasses could superimpose an attention-getting graphic over something (car, person, etc) that you might otherwise not see until it’s too late.
5: I am terrible with names. A conversational facebook would be a godsend. And frankly, I wouldn’t mind someone facebooking me while they talked to me. I’m pretty sure I could get over the initial icky feeling.
6: Finally, a problem. We already miss beauty because we’re distracted by our computers and our iPods. I suppose we’ll have to balance when we wear our glasses and when we leave them at home. I’d probably stargaze some with them, and some without them. Picking out obscure or dim constellations in the sky is part of the pleasure. I’m more likely to see a shooting star while wearing iGlasses than looking in a book.
7: To tie back to some earlier posts, could you combine a blank book and your iGlasses as an e-book reader? You get to actually turn the pages, and feel the book progress, but when you’re done with Tolstoy, just close the book, and open it again to Sontag. It’d be a beast to design, but it is very doable.
10: And for fun speculation, let’s consider the feasibility of using iGlasses as “handicaps” a la Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron. The more intelligent someone is, the more distracted they’d be by a superabundance of information. As long as you can control what information is available, you can limit what people know or remember. After all, if you see something briefly, and never can find it again, it’s almost as if it never happened (this hints of Orwell). This happens to me regularly, and I have a much easier time just accepting that knowledge as unattainable.
Have you read Adam Greenfield’s Everyware yet?
@Thomas: No, I haven’t heard of it. This hasn’t been something I’ve really been thinking about much; the story’s true, I literally thought of this as I walked home last night. But now that I’ve spent a few hours nailing together these thoughts, I’m intrigued. Is it a novel or nonfiction?
@Austin: Excellent points all around. Re: #2, I’m sure one day our glasses will be our phones. But I think the first iteration of iGlasses will really just be the monitor for the more powerful CPU found in mobile handhelds.
Re: the rest of your points — I guess the question we’ll have to ask is, at what point do we augment our reality so much that we might as well be sitting in front of a screen or looking down at an iPhone? Sure there might be collision avoidance protocols or “alerts” when you walk by someone you know while you’re reading the news on your lenses… but does that augment reality or just clue us back into it from the deluge of information we’re literally layering onto our worldview? If someone is Facebooking you while you’re talking to them, are they listening to you? Are they in reality (albeit an augmented one), or are they lost in the Web?
One feature I would want to see on a device like this is some kind of indicator — a small glowing LED on the corner where the lens meets the frame, or something — that announces when someone has their iGlasses engaged. If I’m talking to my friend and want his full attention, I want to know that as he looks at me through his glasses whether or not he’s checking his email at the same time.
Jarred
You’re certainly correct that the first generation will probably have tethered power and computing. My comment was intended to argue that iGlasses would function better as a self-contained apparatus that didn’t piggyback on technology that we’re comfortable with today. The problem isn’t really in computing power. It’s in energy storage. Moore’s Law (exponential growth) still holds for CPUs and memory, but battery tech is a chemistry problem. Without major leaps in technology (fuel cells for example), we’re constrained to linear growth in power availability.
I suppose that the whole point of augmenting reality is to allow the freedom of movement, with the accompanying interactions, both physical and psychological, without sacrificing external storage. A fully mature pair of iGlasses would confer the connectivity of your computer screen, except that you aren’t bound to even a laptop. Doing research while strolling in a park seems backward, but if you’d be doing that same research seated in a cubicle otherwise, then iGlasses are a good thing. It comes back to being responsible for your connectivity. And come on. The iPhone is currently one of the closest things we have to an immersive device, but it isn’t. It is stupidly easy to interact with, but it isn’t designed to split your focus.
An entirely different question is what is reality. If the world is strictly constrained to physical interactions, then we aren’t having this conversation. If we allow computerized information to be part of our “world”, then augmenting what you would naturally see with it is no more unnatural than taking off a pair of gloves. Mind you, we’re supplementing here, not supplanting. When you turn off the physical world in favor of the digital one, you’re no better than a Friday night shut in playing Halo on Live.
As far as “lost in the web” goes, you should check out the Ghost in the Shell series. Some of it is great anime, some of it’s pretty mediocre, but the philosophical thrust is apparently right up your alley.
It’s probably unreasonable to generally expect for someone to completely unplug while you’re talking to them. Have you ever turned off your cell phone or slept your computer because your current conversation was so intense? I never have, probably because I didn’t think to. I wouldn’t want someone checking their e-mail while I was talking to them, but I wouldn’t mind them having a weather report or something innocuous taking up a tiny fraction of their attention. It might be possible to have your iGlasses transmit the amount of “load” they’re delivering, which other glasses would represent by darkening the frames or faces. I’m only a little (a lot) creeped out by the mental image of a crowd of blacked out faces walking on a sidewalk. An external LED would be a good idea, though, if you interacted with people who didn’t wear iGlasses.
@Jarred: It’s non-fiction, and one of the few books on ubiquitous computing aimed at a more general audience (designers, info architects, programmers, people generally interested in the issues). It’s full of great discussion on how much of the technology needed for an augmented reality isn’t that far off, as well as explorations of ambient information being embedded in our daily environment. Definitely check it out.
The first chapter of the book is up on alistapart: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/everyware
Greenfield’s website is here: http://speedbird.wordpress.com/
So here’s where I draw the line: http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/21/digital-tattoo-interface-creepy-concept-that-runs-on-blood/.
I don’t think I would ever be choose to implant a gadget in my body, unless it were keeping me alive or would help keep me alive (e.g. a pacemaker, or a chip with my medical history for download by EMT). I could deal with iGlasses and maybe even iContacts, I don’t think I’d ever want an optical implant.
A cellphone implanted in my arm that is interfaced by dynamic tattoos? *shivers* Thanks, but I’ll pass.
Looks like augmented reality might be closer than we thought…
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/12_future_apps_for_your_iphone.php
Another step towards augmented reality — Google Street View integrates with map directions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgJSXrkwshg
the gargoyles. I’ve always heard that there was a Darth Vader gargoyle up there somewhere
Delet
I considered pulling out my iPhone to look it up on Wikipedia, but it just felt like a little too much effort and I had to hurry and grab some dinner
That was truly useable information. I will subscribe for this web log, it’s very useful.Good work .. well done.