BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/ the love of change Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-1786 A Sign of the Times: “Extra” Lets You Really Read All About It | Tropophilia Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:03:11 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-1786 [...] a service bought by the NYT sometime in 2005 (I briefly gushed about it in the opening paragraph of this post on the social graph back in January, but haven’t used it regularly since).  Blogrunner runs [...] [...] a service bought by the NYT sometime in 2005 (I briefly gushed about it in the opening paragraph of this post on the social graph back in January, but haven’t used it regularly since).  Blogrunner runs [...]

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-19 Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. Day « Tropophilia Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:51:51 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-19 [...] Who Owns the Social Graph? - Is it you, your “friends,” or Facebook?  Jarred investigates. [...] [...] Who Owns the Social Graph? – Is it you, your “friends,” or Facebook?  Jarred investigates. [...]

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-22 Breaking: Facebook, Plaxo, and Google Endorse Data Portability « Tropophilia Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:00:37 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-22 [...] Jarred Tags: Data Portability, Facebook, Google, Social Networks, web 2.0 A few days ago I wrote about the data portability debate sparked by the deactivation of Robert Scoble’s Facebook [...] [...] Jarred Tags: Data Portability, Facebook, Google, Social Networks, web 2.0 A few days ago I wrote about the data portability debate sparked by the deactivation of Robert Scoble’s Facebook [...]

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-21 Jarred Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:44:42 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-21 I completely agree with your concerns. That's why I think Facebook itself must continue to be vigilant in cracking down on scraping, while at the same time providing a legitimate means of exporting the information. And you are absolutely right that Facebook must give users the privacy controls necessary to limit how much information Facebook can allow others to export about them. This is similar to the News Feed privacy controls... you control what sorts of information, or "stories," are exportable. So if I want my full profile to be exportable, I can have that; if you want only your name, picture, and e-mail address to be exportable, you can have that. Basically, the metaphor is that Facebook allows you to design the "business card" that you're going to let other people keep (and, potentially, pass on to others). My point is that if Facebook doesn't find a way to export the information itself, then people will continue to steal that information illicitly. The one counterpoint I will make is this. I know it is uncomfortable to think that someone could either scrape or download information that wouldn't fit into my first "business card" metaphor - relationship details, drunken photos, etc. But that person can ALWAYS publicize that information manually. I could go to your profile, take a screen shot, and post it on this blog. That's why the whole new concept of "friending" in the social network context is dangerous. Is someone enough of a "friend", do you trust them enough, to let them have access to that information even privately? The more interconnected the web becomes, the more we have to be careful about what we put online, even if it is behind very carefully designed privacy controls. I completely agree with your concerns. That’s why I think Facebook itself must continue to be vigilant in cracking down on scraping, while at the same time providing a legitimate means of exporting the information. And you are absolutely right that Facebook must give users the privacy controls necessary to limit how much information Facebook can allow others to export about them. This is similar to the News Feed privacy controls… you control what sorts of information, or “stories,” are exportable. So if I want my full profile to be exportable, I can have that; if you want only your name, picture, and e-mail address to be exportable, you can have that. Basically, the metaphor is that Facebook allows you to design the “business card” that you’re going to let other people keep (and, potentially, pass on to others). My point is that if Facebook doesn’t find a way to export the information itself, then people will continue to steal that information illicitly.

The one counterpoint I will make is this. I know it is uncomfortable to think that someone could either scrape or download information that wouldn’t fit into my first “business card” metaphor – relationship details, drunken photos, etc. But that person can ALWAYS publicize that information manually. I could go to your profile, take a screen shot, and post it on this blog. That’s why the whole new concept of “friending” in the social network context is dangerous. Is someone enough of a “friend”, do you trust them enough, to let them have access to that information even privately? The more interconnected the web becomes, the more we have to be careful about what we put online, even if it is behind very carefully designed privacy controls.

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-2556 Jarred Taylor Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:44:00 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-2556 I completely agree with your concerns. That's why I think Facebook itself must continue to be vigilant in cracking down on scraping, while at the same time providing a legitimate means of exporting the information. And you are absolutely right that Facebook must give users the privacy controls necessary to limit how much information Facebook can allow others to export about them. This is similar to the News Feed privacy controls... you control what sorts of information, or "stories," are exportable. So if I want my full profile to be exportable, I can have that; if you want only your name, picture, and e-mail address to be exportable, you can have that. Basically, the metaphor is that Facebook allows you to design the "business card" that you're going to let other people keep (and, potentially, pass on to others). My point is that if Facebook doesn't find a way to export the information itself, then people will continue to steal that information illicitly. The one counterpoint I will make is this. I know it is uncomfortable to think that someone could either scrape or download information that wouldn't fit into my first "business card" metaphor - relationship details, drunken photos, etc. But that person can ALWAYS publicize that information manually. I could go to your profile, take a screen shot, and post it on this blog. That's why the whole new concept of "friending" in the social network context is dangerous. Is someone enough of a "friend", do you trust them enough, to let them have access to that information even privately? The more interconnected the web becomes, the more we have to be careful about what we put online, even if it is behind very carefully designed privacy controls. I completely agree with your concerns. That’s why I think Facebook itself must continue to be vigilant in cracking down on scraping, while at the same time providing a legitimate means of exporting the information. And you are absolutely right that Facebook must give users the privacy controls necessary to limit how much information Facebook can allow others to export about them. This is similar to the News Feed privacy controls… you control what sorts of information, or “stories,” are exportable. So if I want my full profile to be exportable, I can have that; if you want only your name, picture, and e-mail address to be exportable, you can have that. Basically, the metaphor is that Facebook allows you to design the “business card” that you’re going to let other people keep (and, potentially, pass on to others). My point is that if Facebook doesn’t find a way to export the information itself, then people will continue to steal that information illicitly.

The one counterpoint I will make is this. I know it is uncomfortable to think that someone could either scrape or download information that wouldn’t fit into my first “business card” metaphor – relationship details, drunken photos, etc. But that person can ALWAYS publicize that information manually. I could go to your profile, take a screen shot, and post it on this blog. That’s why the whole new concept of “friending” in the social network context is dangerous. Is someone enough of a “friend”, do you trust them enough, to let them have access to that information even privately? The more interconnected the web becomes, the more we have to be careful about what we put online, even if it is behind very carefully designed privacy controls.

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-20 taylora412 Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:02:22 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-20 Jrod-- I'm going to have to jump in here and disagree, simply because I think the business card analogy is a false parallel to draw here. The fact is, a facebook profile is much more than a business card--in all the best and worst ways. Sure I might not mind Scoble or others being able to freely port my contact info or carefully chosen identifying data (a la a business card, where every detail, logo, affiliation is carefully chosen) into whatever app he pleases...but what about more sensitive things like who I'm dating, what my political and religious beliefs are, even what books I like and music I listen to? I would never put that info on a business card to hand out to people I don't know...and many on facebook likely go to far with how liberally they share personal information, photos etc (remember all of those lectures from career services types on how our future employers would parse our facebook accounts?). I agree that name, contact info, etc is different...but as of now there's no differentiation (to Scoble, on facebook, etc) between my email address and my relationship status. I find that a little anxiety-inducing. Jrod– I’m going to have to jump in here and disagree, simply because I think the business card analogy is a false parallel to draw here. The fact is, a facebook profile is much more than a business card–in all the best and worst ways. Sure I might not mind Scoble or others being able to freely port my contact info or carefully chosen identifying data (a la a business card, where every detail, logo, affiliation is carefully chosen) into whatever app he pleases…but what about more sensitive things like who I’m dating, what my political and religious beliefs are, even what books I like and music I listen to? I would never put that info on a business card to hand out to people I don’t know…and many on facebook likely go to far with how liberally they share personal information, photos etc (remember all of those lectures from career services types on how our future employers would parse our facebook accounts?). I agree that name, contact info, etc is different…but as of now there’s no differentiation (to Scoble, on facebook, etc) between my email address and my relationship status. I find that a little anxiety-inducing.

]]> BUY Tetracycline Cap. ONLINE NO PRESCRIPTION http://tropophilia.com/2008/01/05/who-owns-the-social-graph/#comment-2555 taylora412 Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:02:00 +0000 http://tropophilia.com/?p=26#comment-2555 Jrod-- I'm going to have to jump in here and disagree, simply because I think the business card analogy is a false parallel to draw here. The fact is, a facebook profile is much more than a business card--in all the best and worst ways. Sure I might not mind Scoble or others being able to freely port my contact info or carefully chosen identifying data (a la a business card, where every detail, logo, affiliation is carefully chosen) into whatever app he pleases...but what about more sensitive things like who I'm dating, what my political and religious beliefs are, even what books I like and music I listen to? I would never put that info on a business card to hand out to people I don't know...and many on facebook likely go to far with how liberally they share personal information, photos etc (remember all of those lectures from career services types on how our future employers would parse our facebook accounts?). I agree that name, contact info, etc is different...but as of now there's no differentiation (to Scoble, on facebook, etc) between my email address and my relationship status. I find that a little anxiety-inducing. Jrod– I’m going to have to jump in here and disagree, simply because I think the business card analogy is a false parallel to draw here. The fact is, a facebook profile is much more than a business card–in all the best and worst ways. Sure I might not mind Scoble or others being able to freely port my contact info or carefully chosen identifying data (a la a business card, where every detail, logo, affiliation is carefully chosen) into whatever app he pleases…but what about more sensitive things like who I’m dating, what my political and religious beliefs are, even what books I like and music I listen to? I would never put that info on a business card to hand out to people I don’t know…and many on facebook likely go to far with how liberally they share personal information, photos etc (remember all of those lectures from career services types on how our future employers would parse our facebook accounts?). I agree that name, contact info, etc is different…but as of now there’s no differentiation (to Scoble, on facebook, etc) between my email address and my relationship status. I find that a little anxiety-inducing.

]]>